Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blossomingtree
Color please?
BT
|
After looking at your question and reviewing the post that precipitated it, I propose an addendum:
I see the error of calling non-duality anything at all including a field or a general term for that matter. They are all but placeholders at best.
On a semi-related note, two items....
1) a perspective,
Neti, neti as a practical vehicle for travel. It still seems limiting as its sole mission is to negate
everything but what negates negation? It's mission incomplete and so it will travel forever on that mission.
Then this flashed in my thought at the same time as I was composing the above,
Neti neti does not actually exist just as time does not exist. There is nothing to do and nothing to be done or ever was or will.
What is done in manifest is done for the sake of itself or restated, I does for I. It may look at times like I does for beyond itself but that's another I or more succinctly..... I.
2) A proposition:
Nonduality, a more refined state of duality.