Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kepler
Anyway, in my previous post I was playing along with the assumptions up to that point. It's worth discussing those as well.
Vibrational spectrum of what? For there to be a vibration, some thing needs to be vibrating. Also, how do both the high and low ends of this spectrum correspond to zero motion?
Remember, even if everything is made of energy, there are different kinds of energy. For example, it's nonsensical to think of an electromagnetic wave interfering with a water wave.
Can you go into some more detail here. Our thoughts do produce some EM waves, that's for sure. Is that what you're talking about?
|
1. Zero motion is not vibrational. It is not kinetic energy (which is vibrational), it is latent energy. Metaphysically, latent energy is creator of everything, but it is not itself born or created and it cannot be destroyed.
2. The creation of kinetic energy comes from a latent potential. In electronics, this is called voltage (which also means potential) EM waves happen when voltage potential is oscillated in waves and particle movements called in QM sometimes packets. Clumsy, but it is a young science. This only happens when there is resistance to the EM waves. I'm working on understanding why that is. Everything physical has resistance. When it comes to EM waves, this is more complex because of capacitive and inductive influences.
A bit more technically The impedance of free space, Z0, is a physical constant relating the magnitudes of the electric and magnetic fields of electromagnetic radiation travelling through free space. That is, Z0 = |E|/|H|, where |E| is the electric field strength and |H| magnetic field strength. It has an exact value, given approximately as 376.73031... ohms per meter.
3. The impedance of free space equals the product of the vacuum permeability or magnetic constant μ0 and the speed of light in vacuum c0. Since the numerical values of the magnetic constant and of the speed of light are fixed by the definitions of the ampere and the metre respectively, the exact value of the impedance of free space is likewise fixed by definition and is not subject to experimental error.
4. I intend to discuss this more fully with some people from where I work, come next week. Very interesting discussion, and thanks to all involved.
Ps... I am probably going to have to write a poem or something to counterbalance all this logical stuff after a while.
