Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ground
Here I cannot agree because non-X obviously depends on X.
|
But isn't that the illusion of duality? That there's a distinction between X and non-X, when in fact they're one and the same?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ground
From my perspective non-dualistic mode excludes oneness as it excludes manyness because 'one' depends on 'many'.
|
I'm also curious as to how you've arrived at this conclusion? I might be missing something, I thought non-dualism and oneness were synonymous.