View Single Post
  #24  
Old 13-04-2018, 01:13 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Book1 Pi-Time = 66.4

This is a correction from previous post in this thread


With this new 66.40 90 10 as the Pi-Time revelation I began thinking of actual frequency of action/motion ergo, I thought o 66 invaginations or 66 cycles/loops around the tube of a torus, not the whole torus.

This part as follows is revised fro previous post in this thread

......this would be the internal body{ reality/time } sine-wave /\/\/ triangulated set of 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 etc..60, 90,120, 150, 180, 210 ---see numerical pattern bottom of page--- and we arrive at the 66th invagination being number #228 ergo the 228th nodal event as i invagination from outer{ top line } as Gravity ( ), if we do not count the 0{ zero } --a<strong> non-counting number</strong>, in of itself---.

If we do count the 0{ zero } then number #225, is the 225th nodal event is the 66th invagination inner{ bottom line } from Dark Energy )(.


P^4 = 97.40 90 91 minus 31 = 66.4
P^3 = 31.00 '62' 7 66
..31 great circles of the 5-fold icos{20}ahedron..
..31 bilateral spinal nerves total '62'.....
..66 lines-of-relationship exist between 12 vertexes of both the 4-fold VE, and the 5-fold icosahedron.

666 > 222 > 111 > 55.5 { see Fibonacci 55 as 11th number }
666 > 333 > 166.5 > 83.25 > 41.625 > 20.825 > 10.425 > 5.2


...1...........5....7...........11....13.......... ...17......19.............23....25.......
-
-
0.................6..................12........... ..........18......................24...........
..........3................9.....................1 5.......................21.......................

-
-
.......2....4...........8...10............14.....1 6...............20.....22..............26
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote