|
First one has to accept that analytically 'non-duality' is a paradox because the negation of anything is itself a manifestation of duality and so is the negation of duality.
Actually an infinite regress would be required:
non(...(non(non(non(non-duality))))).
The infiniteness of this regress shows that what can be expressed with the term 'non-duality' never can be a concrete determinate reality but necessarily is an indeterminate psycho-mental experience.
All the misunderstandings in the context of the term 'non-duality' originate from confusing indeterminate experiential language with analytical ontological language.
Since there is no 'beyond infiniteness' in the context of this infinite regress one may apply the term 'oneness' which however may again be misleading because in the sphere of infiniteness there are neither periphery nor outer limits but boundless openness. This again implies an indeterminate psycho-mental experience but no determinate reality in the context of applying the term 'oneness'.
|