|
Nope!.
O.k, I will try to explain it differently or paraphrase it...
Two ways of calculation, the mentioned ones...right?.
These conclude to the same number, right?.
Let us say for example, both ways of calculation conclude to 2 or 4 or 6...
Let us take 2 first.
When using the first way of calculation number 2 results from the master number 11 and the addition of 1+1 of this number.
When using the second way of calculation, the total number is 20 which is again 2 but, there is no master number here.
In regards to 6,
Same for another birthdate that with the first way of calculation, it results in 33, with the second calculation it results to 6 but, there is no master number as in the first case.
When we add 3+3, it does give us 6, same number as when the second way of calculation was used only based on the second way of calculation, there is no master number at all.
These are the same dates of birth used in both ways of calculations and the calculations are right. The production of a master number or not in this case and the specific dates of births is based and depended upon the way of calculation, whether the numbers of birthdate will be calculated in a straight line or reduced into a single digit first(day, month, year) and then, added together to give the total.
The first way produces a master number, the second one does not.
So, the question is, which of the two mentioned ways of calculation is the correct one, if there is "a correct way" .
|