View Single Post
  #18  
Old 12-02-2018, 11:05 AM
Eelco
Posts: n/a
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by markings
1) If the teaching explicitly or implicitly states that one has to change ones present western materialistic life, e.g. meditate for 3 hours a day, become vegetarian if not vegan, etc before one can even hope for any movement in spiritual terms then people are not prepared to listen.
2) If people are not prepared to listen then they cannot be taught

Therefore one has to look at the message and that is often a confused and irrational one. It is up to the teacher to give explanations which are clear and make sense to ordinary people.
There are paradoxes, easily resolved, but instead of doing that they are used to score points from one followers while losing the ones who cannot make sense of it, through no fault of their own.

I'm confused. Is this the teaching you adhere to? (point 1 above)
Also from what I understand from pure land buddhism. It still holds all the pittfalls human live has. At least If I understand the Pali canon correctly, In both of which it could very well be the case that I misunderstood.

Do you want to elaborate on how you understand Pure Land Buddhism?

With Love
Eelco
Reply With Quote