Quote:
|
Originally Posted by running
outer until it becomes inner. jesus or anything else. outer then inner.
|
I think one can go round and round about this, hence I subscribe to the ‘holy’ definition: “blurry” or “ambiguous” if you like.
(The ambiguous
ness of inner and outer).
Because - in order to
recognize the (sacred
ness of the) ‘outer’, there has to be something already 'within' - for you to do so.
If you/we end up in a non-dual space, ‘who’ came first becomes redundant at that point, me thinks.