Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rah nam
The simple answer to this is, you don't have a HS, and yes you now have Michael as your HS. Strange? Yes.
Now lets assume I am correct, when I say Archangels can not, are not allowed to incarnate on the planet they develop. (By the way, I am told this ruling comes from the Logoi, the one that govern this galaxy) How can we go around this ruling? A group of a higher density creates an "entity" and the Archangel takes it under it's wings, like an adoptive child.
(the term entity was placed in quote, because an entity has a soul and you have not, what stands behind you is the energy of a group of very extensive beings)
Now, is an adoptive Mother the Mother or not? Something that has been widely debated for decades.
|
Yes, that is pretty strange. Michael’s still not giving me all the answers since I’m supposed to talk it out with you, but I got the hint that the Logoi ideas aren’t as accurate as some might think. Whoever wrote about that had similar blocking abilities — and only those with similar abilities could tell. I’ve briefly met the collective mind of whoever ruled this galaxy myself before — I don’t recall them disagreeing.
What do you mean by me not having a soul though? Though I seem to get the idea of how you come to that conclusion — the energies you sense from me don’t seem uniquely as “me”, but a sliced piece or a combination of those pieces from Higher Beings. But I’d still call that “me” in a sense.
How do you define incarnation exactly? I’m curious. I sense we have differing definitions of what it means. If you’re talking about how the energies behind me are a group of Higher Beings — especially Michael’s presence being the most obvious, wouldn’t that make me an incarnation of them in a sense?
Haha, but I do agree that I’m taken as a kind of adoptive child myself. Michael does treat our relationship like a parent-child pairing. Complete with nurturing, disciplining and dad jokes.