Quote:
|
Originally Posted by God-Like
Only of the mind can one identify oneself .
You see if there is a dual reflection of the mind and an awareness of that which reflects and is reflecting then one cannot help but identify with that .
If one associates everything that is self of the mind as illusory then so be it, but it will have to be a dual reflection nevertheless .
The duality of experience isn't illusory, because it's the discernment made that requires duality .
One has to have the comparison of what is real, which can only be known in or of the dual mind environment .
The so called illusion is born in or of duality .
Do you see that is the case?
x daz x
|
Duality or a conceptual existence is not the issue. Its identification with the exterior reflection, confirming a solid center within, that one takes as ownwership. You are putting the cart before the horse (which is a very common thing to do in spirituality). Coceptual reality is not required an owner of experience. Spacial dissernment can be made without minds unconscious perpetual interpretation and personal measuring. Fundamental awareness is all which is needed. However, the owner will fight to keep that idea alive... or simply ignore it. The dual mind environment you speak of is fully anchored by the illussion of you, as someone separate intelectualizing the one, the infinite, source or whatever useless title its given. It is the act of separation attempting to understand non separation or oneness
from the same conditioned playing field of
separation. Thats not it. You are duality at its core, the very foundation of it, so all you can see and further conclude is its extremities and absolutes disguised as awakened or even enlightened. Identification begins to happen as soon as you uttered or sensed the evolving idea of me. Its all play. There is nothing good or bad about it, except if within the dream state of conditioning/identity.