Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gem
Using red shift, Hubble could only tell how fast the car is moving away from him.
Red shift is only a measure of speed. Hubble would tell you exactly how fast the cars are moving away from each other.
Light speed is very, very fast, so he would only see a car light at 50km from a nano second ago.
That's simply incorrect. I'll explain it below.
Redshift only tells us how fast galaxies move away from each other. Nothing else.
Distance is measured by the observed brightness of supernovae. All these supernovae explode with the same brightness, so it's quite simple to derive their distance by how brightly or dimly they appear to us.
Supernovae which are further away appear dimmer, and their red shift is also greater. Thus we conclude that more distant galaxies move away from each other at a greater speed than those in closer proximity. That's what we call 'acceleration'. That is expressed by Hubble's constant. The formula is: velocity = Hubble's constant multiplied by distance.
If I can explain how Hubble's constant works, then you should be able it explain how your theory works. It's not sufficient to claim it is calculated in 4 different ways and not explain anything at all!
|
Red Shift can indicate distance besides speed. All these things you can find in college textbooks and in the Title 'The Universe'. This book presents a new Cosmology by defeating 'Big Bang in about 46 counts. I cannot give coaching on merits of BB.
Regarding VERMA'S EXPERIMENT... the viewers can see the Diagrams and detail on link
http://www.discoverybooks.org/tu-38.html
LHC experiment failed 5 times and was unable to prove Big Bang theory. It would be better if you could guide 9000 scientists there and prove it.