|
If the inquiry was at all serious, feedback should have been provided. There is no use conducting an experiment, or asking for a read, if those engaging and reading have no useful feedback or knowledge of if the experiment was found in any way a success.
I am speaking solely for myself here, as only I can, but I do not ask for any financial gain for any of the readings I do, now they are not yet paragraphs upon paragraphs of information, they look short- at least the energy readings do so far, all I ever ask for is for feedback.
I offer readings to develop ability. I take what I do seriously.
I don't like my time wasted- as despite how short the readings appear, I spend 20-30 minutes for many of them, and the imagery does not come quickly. I have a process, and at the moment development progresses slowly. Time isn't just it, if it were only time taken it may not be too bad, but it requires a lot of my own energy to sit and read, mind needs adequate silencing.
As so far I am under the impression, the inquiry was not serious.
It is difficult to take it seriously when the op posts twice or thrice, and offers no valid responses to those who indeed did what they asked and were not aware of any of the ops previous posts. Further I only even read the starting post. I did not read any posts by other members in response to the op before I read the energy.
All in all a waste of time.
There are many here who do appreciate what others do for them and offer feedback.
So, in that sense there is much to be grateful for.
I do not understand conducting an experiment, and leaving it in the dark. This is an experiment but I'll hide behind ambiguity as to what it is about- so to speak.
It fails my logic.
|