Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Norwegian Wood
An actual science being subtopic to the mass cultural delusion pseudoscience known as astrology? What?
One is an actual study that revolves around substantial scientific evidence and the other triggers teenage girls to believe that the universe is talking to them.  |
Hey NW. Well, you're speaking of strictly modern interpretation. The question is, does the original intended interpretion matter, and have relevance? Rather than the modern interpretation with it's pagan origins?
Look up Adrian Gilbert's book, "Signs in the Sky".
Example, the age of Aquarious is supposed to usher in goodness, Light, and enlightenment.
In one story in the Gospels, when preparing for the location of the last supper, Jesus sends the two disciples to find a man carrying a water pot, and tell him that the master is ready to partake of the Passover meal with them.
What is the original interpretation of the Zodiac, and its original intended interpretation?