View Single Post
  #12  
Old 09-03-2012, 02:57 PM
Chrysaetos Chrysaetos is offline
Master
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,908
  Chrysaetos's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by John DiFool
I dislike the dualism inherent in his view, as if math by itself is a dry dessicated concept divorced from all other concerns, while instead it could be just another tool in the toolbox of the Tao.
Believing in any sort of god, soul, or spirit is dualism. If these things have no material basis (and so far we have found no soul, god, or spirit) then they have to be non-material. This leads to dualism. People who follow non-dualists beliefs or ''advaita'' beliefs may say they are not into dualism but their beliefs cannot point in any different direction.

That's why I said that it doesn't matter whether one takes a Christian God or a ''divine source'', a personal god or a non-personal god, or a dvaita or advaita belief.
It does not matter which god a scientist refers to when they are still said to be non-material by believers.
Reply With Quote