Originally Posted by swampgrl
Your post, FallingLeaves, 'spired the following post. Related?
A player is not a player until cards are dealt. Being a player certainly validates that one is in the game and everything that entails.
In the beginning was the word (cards dealt).
perhaps... but I see that there is quite a bit of disagreement on what it 'entails'.... so can't validate that the idea of disagreement is itself invalid. Because if it were as invalid as we might wish to suppose, it wouldn't have been one of the cards played?