Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Moondance
Yes, from the start it has been agreed that nothing needs to change or dissolve for Oneness (or connection to Oneness) to be the case.
It would be a red herring to repeatedly suggest otherwise.
So once again let’s be clear, realisation is ONLY required for realisation to be the case.
Do you disagree that in order for realisation to be the case, realisation is required? (again, no red herrings please, I’m not asking about connection only about realisation of connection.)
But the opening post of this very thread is about ‘ending the search’ and the role of satsang.
|
The way nonduality ends the search for connection in satsang is by describing connection as unconditional and unavoidable and therefore requiring no change whatsoever. This of course includes changes such as the end of feeling disconnected and realization. If it is not presented in this way and tasks such as realization presented as required, then a condition is created to further burden the seeker, and then of course nonduality loses its basic tenet as unconditional and unavoidable. It then becomes like all other paths and practises with conditions which are required to be met.
Any condition that can be imagined for nonduality to end the search for connection, does not have to be met and there lies its uniqueness.