[Arcturus]

Originally Posted by Yamah

how much of what people do is healing, and how much is imposing their perceptions of what healthy should look like? Infusing the earth as WW does sounds pretty 'intent neutral'... doing something like actively altering a location's vibrations is active and potentially harmful if done wrong.

hi Yamah, they work on places like concentration camps or where a river course has been altered...in the book marko pogacnik is generally asked to go and do what he does and he intentionally communes with the devas or elementals of the place or region to guide him in healing the place, if it's needed. of course it's not something i'd attempt as i know nothing of the practicalities of it. they would also help tree spirits move to new locations if a tree had been cut down yet the roots were still living. also with all the building going on nowadays apparently many energy lines are distorted and so carved stones are used to allow the lines to flow again. i think it's a great service and much needed work in todays world. i agree that imposing your idea on a place is wrong but i felt strongly that it was a co-creative healing from what i read in this particular instance. pure intent is fine, but together with physical help too, that could help more in some places, just like human acupuncture can help more for some conditions, n3

http://www.markopogacnik.com/about.html

earth healing::

http://www.markopogacnik.com/healing.html

the name for earth acupuncture is "litho-puncture".

this was the book i read:: Nature Spirits & Elemental Beings: Working with the Intelligence in Nature