Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OPVerma
This Thread is meant to trace the scientific reasons for differences in physical make up of humans and should not be taken in racist context.
Anthropologists believe, that humans have evolved from primates in Africa during 5- 6 million years ago and their physical makeup changed while migrating to different parts of the world.
Indian Scriptures give an account of their origin from different ' Prajapaties' or Progenitors.
2 billion years ago Brahma, prototype human, produced 10 Progenitors by biological fission on Pamir. 10 Progenitors in their Airy Bodies dispersed in different directions, and became the fore fathers of different human races. as folows
Angira : Red Indians.
Marich : Europeans, Middle East, Indians.
Vashisth : Chinese Japanese, Central Asians.
Pulah ; Short Pygmies
Pilastya : Tall Africans Julus.
Daksha ; Indian
... ... ...
During past 100 millions , there has been a lot of migrations and intermixing.The present Europeans are inter mixture of genetically modified humans 'Gurunds' + Devas sons of Kashyap / Marich, + Aryan Indians. ( Source : The Real History of the Ancient World' ISBN 9788190950268 )
Thus it is apparent that progenitors with different genes are responsible for the difference in physical makeup of humans and not what the Anthropologists speculate. They should update their knowledge, revise the textbooks, and stop misguiding people.
|
So this is interesting. The key to the theory, and I say theory, since all realities are a possibility to someone, is that it is based on the number 6. 6 is the solution to the empire problem or M-pire problem with M = 2. This solution describes the most efficient way of partitioning a map or the surface of a globe into binary combinations, e.g. male and female. The solution to the M-pire problem with M = 1, also known historically as the Four Colour Theorem, though I really think it should be referred to as the Rule of Four, states that the most efficient way to partition a map of the globe into single "races" (here no distinction would be made between male and female) is using 4 labels. So 6 are required for binary combinations and 4 are required for single labels. Note, both assume there is no mixing. Applying these theorems is essentially a form of government of one's territory, indeed one application of the Four Colour Theorem is the Caste system of India. It is important to note, other than the fact that the theorems do not include the possibility of mixing, that they do not describe a hierarchical order either, in that they describe the partitioning of a surface and which is not linearly ordered. One can apply a linear order, collapsing the surface into a line, however, and this is the basis of racism. Not including the possibility of mixing is conservative, but not necessarily racist. To include the possibility of mixing, an algebra has to be applied, and to make sure such mixing is non-racist, this algebra must respect the fact that the four or six labels are not hierarchically arranged. Personally, I'm still not sure about how to describe such an algebra, but I believe the knowledge is available somewhere.