Quote:
|
Originally Posted by davidsun
[An aside to Froebellian, just in case he hasn't totally huffed-n-puffed himself 'out' of here: What follows is what a really 'perfect' :) 'discussion' actually IS about.]
It has been said that a 'picture' is worth 'a thousand words'. I think the following picture resolves (re-solves) the conundrum (being 'struggles' with above) which arises as a result of the limitations of strictly word-based, hence necessarily linear in terms of meaning-sequence, logic. 
Also, in response to what WabiSabi then went on to express:
I would like to copy-share a one of 'naturesflows' posts from another thread: |
Thanks for the post. As is constantly revealed to me, I see that we are all speaking of the same indescribable reality, and that all we are really doing is arguing semantics. But that then begs the question, why talk about it at all?