|
I think the expression "all is one" is simply logic--as all which is is one. There is nothing, can be nothing, which is not included in "all"--that is what all means- to me anyway.
Seems to me there is a lot of mystique attached to a condition which just is, doesn't have to be made, fought for, argued for, etc.all is just there, and here, and everywhere. No skill needed, no practices needed to bring about.Already here, there, everywhere. Always here, there, everywhere. --and all regardless of being recognised or not. petex
|