Quote:
Originally Posted by Gem
So basically, words in use are not necessarily dualistic. Indeed the nuance of meaning is very broad and nuanced within the larger context. If we were to say words are dualistic, we would have to assume all communications are dualistic, body language, facial expression, expressive sounds like 'mmmm'. How can it be dualistic when 'mmmmm' may communicate contemplating, something delicious, physical attraction and a number of other meanings?
|
Maybe dualistic isn't necessarily the right word, maybe words of multiplicity could be used for better understanding however I see multiplicity as an extension of duplicity so there is that.
The trunk of the tree is not separate from the branches. If words are not necessarily dualistic, doesn't that make them dualistic by default?