The only 4D reality there is, for us, is the one we create with our consciousness. You may create a similar one to mine, but it is never exactly the same, your clocks and rulers will always differ from mine, sometimes a little, sometimes a lot. When we speak of the physical plane, we often forget that the "stuff" we think of as physical is not made up of any "stuff" at all. Prior to observation, the physical particle is just a probability wave of what it might be seen to be once observed. It is the act of observation that changes the wave into a particle, what might be into what is, in fact seemingly even into what was. Is the wave now gone, does the particle now exist in absolute, or does it just exist in our consciousness and those consciousnesses who are entangled with our own? If we look closely at the particle, will we find any "stuff" there at all, or just kinetic and potential energies, masquerading as stuff. In the nineteenth century, science believed it would eventually be able to reproduce and explain all phenomenon in a way that is understandable to all. The twentieth century blew that idea up. The universe does not behave like a large mechanical clock. We may be able to statistically predict the universe, but we can never know the outcome of any event without some degree of uncertainty. This is not because we are not good enough, but because the universe is not certain what it will do until asked. Until asked, it could do just about anything. Perhase what the universe will do depends on what questions we ask it and how we ask them. And any answer it gives, will never be exactly the same in your 4D space-time reality as it is in mine.

It all sounds absurd, yet there it is, if you don't understand it don't feel bad, nobody really does.




http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170...uantum-physics