Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gem
Yes, that is the construction of law as it pertains to the state of the observer, and in the philosophical framework that posits consciousness as fundamental, we can consider the universe to be observation - hence the priori of, or separation of, observer and observed can only be assumed arbitrarily. The assumption of this arbitrary notion, therefore, leaves unanswerable the question, to whom or what does law apply?
|
Wonderfully stated Gem! If we are composed of the very essence of that which creates and sustains us then how can we possibly discern contrast? It's akin to the old comparison of whether or not a fish would know what water is? It would be difficult to explore and compare the integrity of a culture if all one ever knew was the culture they were weened on.
And one of the hardest thing for any individual to explore is their own definition of self, objectively and without prejudice. Therapist are encouraged to find other therapist for their own individualized counseling and are also encouraged not to "treat" their own family, since the theme of such council would be entwined with their own personal self interest.
True objectivity is nearly an impossible undertaking on even the most simplest of observations, let alone what we're up against when trying to tackle "the big picture".