Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeS80
In a way you are right in that it could be misunderstood, but I think that it's clear that the text is talking about our true inner self, atman (soul or spirit, if you will) Perfect knowledge or intuition that reside in our hearts. Almost anything could be misunderstood.
|
Yes, the
Isness of
Being!!!
It is
always there (i.e.,
Present)
whenever one focuses one's 'senses' on
It.
Anything else* one may think, feel, believe and say about
It is one's 'own' (subjective) 'construct', hence my labeling
that a 'hallucination'.
* "The Tao (i.e. the 'Way' of Being) that can be spoken is not
the Tao." Yada Yada.
Some 'ways' are
more positively 'creative' of Love and Joy
because they are
more functionally relational (less solipsistically
self-centered) 'in connection'
to and with others.
My rejection of Ewwerrin's God/Being 'trip' is a function of my 'seeing' it as being
self-centeredly
dissociated from the 'suffering' others
are really encountering and experiencing. He said this himself: essentially 'hallucinatorily' IMO
disregarding
their encounter and experience (tho not his own) as
just being 'illusion'.