Quote:
|
Originally Posted by anthony c
i know it's just an example but if you substitute the eye with knowing/awareness you can only be that awareness and then there is an profound bliss(bliss and knowing of your true self becomes clear as day), just typing this i felt bliss as i remembered to do this and this is why i said that but that is Pure being.
|
I think we agree on the main point and it's probably just semantics. I'm just saying Consciousness is Awareness is Pure Being is Atman is Brahman is Source, etc... We - and I mean Ahamkara/ego - tend to localize it. The illusion is "I am conscious" whereas I would say we are Consciousness itself. It's the aspect of experience that is our tether to the Divine. Right here and right now.
The way I see the presentation in the video you linked can be correlated with this talk.
Two Steps to the Not-Two: Swami Sarvapriyananda https://youtu.be/kPdsAPlK2Js
Step 1 is the first view (relative - dual) in the video you linked and Step 2 is the second view (Absolute - nondual).