Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RyanWind
You are basically imagining what would this planet be like if no humans were on it. Every living thing has a consciousness. There is a point of awareness and perception inside every living thing. So even if humans were not here, conscious energy would still be here. Also, since this conscious energy is interacting with physical forms and data, it is evolving. So what is, is evolving into higher forms. Now say there was nothing living on this planet and conscious energy did not exist. If that was true, the planet would not exist.
Did you know rainbows don't exist if no one is around to see them? Moisture and light created light waves enters the human eye and looks like a rainbow. If there were no animals with eyes to translate the light waves into colors etc, they would not be there. The light waves would be there but they need an eye or lense to receive the data and a translator of that wave/data and then a consciousness to perceive or "experience/see" it. Really all there is is tiny atomic particles. Energy and matter. For a planet to exist there has to be a living things to perceive the atoms etc as a planet. The perceiver is the creator and so the perception itself is a sign of the intent of the ultimate creator. Look around your room. That is all atoms. We know this because we have microscopes that can look up close. Buzzing moving energy particles of electrons etc. That's what's here. The fact this buzzing hive of particles looks like a table or chair or bed etc is because of us. We are turning the minute particles into objects.
|
Conscious living would still be here, you imply an evaluated interpretation of what consciousness actually is, as if you know what consciousness is.
Yet an animal that precedes your own life is being evalued by your organic presence, just because you are present. You make statements that include its information with your own....yet by review and condition, if we did not procreate, no human would survive the animal kingdom as some form of conscious awareness making statements about a condition where its own life does not exist.
This is the problem with human life, believing they know it all only because the involve a state that allows review. Why do you believe you are allowed to review Nature in our own pursuit of self gain...a resource....yet if we all died and the animal Nature still lived where is your review that science is giving to Nature by including its purpose/function with our own.
The reality of thinking demonstrates that a Scientist is totally self possessed about his review of reality. Only sexual intercourse allows you to remain alive to review other conditions to which your own life does not belong.
By including this information along with your own as evaluations, we have always gotten destroyed because of your consciousness and how you evaluate conditions to which your own life does not belong.
For instance since when is a human life in nuclear fuel....yet you create nuclear fuel, you make statements that you survived the creation of nuclear fuel...yet make a building to hold the fuel within because if it was released it would kill all life. Since when is this review factual reality?