Pi-Time = 66.4 Option #1
 

Pi-Time = 66.4, ergo I considered the 66th invagination from peak of positive and negative curvature in my geo-numerical torus

#396 is 66th invagination { from peak of positive curvature } of torus if we do not count 0

#393th is 66th invagination { from peak of negative curvature } if we do not count the 0.

..1.5..7...11..13.17--------- outer positive curvature -----------------------
-
-
0.....6........12.........18....24.....30....36... ...42....48.....54.....60---------396.......402...
...3......9............15.....21....27.....33....3 9.....45.....51.....57--------393.......399........
-
-
.2..4..8..10.....14----------------- inner negative curvature -----------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is process that led to Pi-Time = 66.4
Pi^3{ XYZ/3D } = 31-00 62 7 66

..........Pi^4 = 97.40 90 9 10 34 00 24 37236440332688705

minus XYZ/3D 31
---------------------
............equals 66.4

Pi-Time = 1.57 Option #2
 

(----) = diameter >Pi< circle{ geodesic curvature }
....ergo Pi { 3.14 }.....

--(--)-- = four radii values ergo a doubled diameter because there are four radii in two invaginations and that is diameter doubled for one geodesic circle/arc in my geo-numerical torus

..ergo Pi / 2 { halved } = 1.57 07 9 63 26 79 48 9 66 192313216916398

Ergo in the following were working in fours i.e. each great circle/arc around the tube includes two invaginations and that is 4 radii.

4-radii =1.57 07 9 63 as two Pi-based invaginations of one geodesic circle

8-radii = 3.14 15 9 26 via two geodesic circle arcs "" ""

12-radii = 4.71 23 8 89 via 3 geodesic circle/arcs "" ""

16-radii = 6.28 31 8 52 via 4 geodeisc circle/arcs of geo-numerical torus

20-radii = 7.85 39 8 15 via 5 "" "" ""

24-radii = 9.42 47 7 78 via 6 "" ""

28-radii = 10.99 55 7 41 via 7 "" ""



#396 is 66th invagination { from peak of positive curvature } of torus if we do not count 0

#393th is 66th invagination { from peak of negative curvature } if we do not count the 0.

..1.5..7...11..13.17-------------------------------------------------
-
-
0.....6........12.........18....24.....30....36... ...42....48.....54.....60---------396........402...
...3......9............15.....21....27.....33....3 9.....45.....51.....57--------393.......399........
-
-
.2..4..8..10.....14--------------------------------------------------------

I don't see your spirituality related point. Can you?

You made me curious to look up "66th invagination" ... Nothing to report!

Then, Now And Future, Omni-considerate Concerns
 

Helps to understand my definitions of spirit and soul that ive posted many time here at SF over the years.

To search for truth of how our finite Universe and its finite parts act as finite, integral whole to create Eartl-like planets an all biological life.


You looked yet you didnt go to the source and I am the source for that info. Go figure and get back to me. Or not. Your choice then, now and future.

Thanks .

You know that "1" can be many and many can be "1" , the infinity simbol
defined the continuum in this equation of the number "1" being actualy more than simply just one however
being many at the same time which explain the loop in time but also in the realm of physicality ..
All other equations are all curves and lace to create the illusion of grandeur , and it seems you are the one guilty of that .

Wholy/Holy/Trinity { 3D-4 } > { 2D-3 }
 

Ascension, not sure if I can follow your train of thought clearly. Ex you "loop in time". If you can state you viewpoints in another way perhaps that will help.

Uni = one{ 1 }.

Universe = one verse i.e. one { Uni } finite, integral verse { scenario }.

Our finite, eternally existent Universe, is composed of many parts, that, exist as integral, wholistic, one-verse { Uni-verse } via our Observed Time/reality frequencies { ^v^v } being connected derivatives of gravity ( ) and dark energy )(.

( > * < ) i ( > * < ) = simplest texticonic symbolism for a part{s} that combined to compose the whole "U"niverse metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts via consciousness that conceive of a most wholistic set.

Ive elaborated greatly on the latter three above in various threads.

1} "U"niverse = greatest { most wholistic } set/group{ wholy/holy trinty } >,

2}Universe { Uni-V-erse }--cosmic/wholy/trinity>,

3} universe = local personal universe of relative significant influence{ my own private Idaho{ was also a song/tune }

Also if any of you comments or thoughts are more directly related to my Pi-Time topic and comments as stated please share and clarify where possible.

Universe aka the cosmos truly is a grand phenomena ergo very impressive of grand importance to those who think big.

28 > 56 > ? {Isotope stability numbers }
 

I take special note of 28 and 56 below that are nearest to since Fuller was so especially consider of whole rational{?} numbers

..ergo Pi / 2 { halved } = 1.57 07 9 63 26 79 48 9 66 192313216916398

4-radii =1.57 07 9 63 as two Pi-based invaginations of one geodesic great circle around tube not whole torus

8-radii = 3.14 15 9 26 via two geodesic arcs define approximate one great circle "" ""

12-radii = 4.71 23 8 89 via 3 geodesic circles/cycles/loops "" ""
16-radii = 6.28 31 8 52 via 4 geodesic circles/cycle/loops ""
20-radii = 7.85 39 8 15 via 5 "" "" ""
24-radii = 9.42 47 7 78 via 6 "" "


28-radii = 10.99 55 7 41 via 7 "" ""


32-radii = 12.56 77 0 4 via 8 "" ""
36-radii = 14.13 71 6 67 via 9"" ""
40-radii = 15.70 79 6 3 via 10 “” “”
44-radii = 17.27 87 5 93 via 11 “” “”
48-radii = 18.84 95 1 6 via 12 “” “’
52-radii = 20.42 03 5 19 via 13 “ “


56-radii = 21.99 11 4 82 via 14 great cricl/arcs around tube, not whole torus { geo-numerical }.

60-radii = 23.56 19 4 45 via 15 “” “”
64-radii = 25.13 27 4 08 via 16 “”
68-radii = 26.70 35 3 71 via 17 “
72-radii = 28.27 43 3 34 via 18 “
76-radii = 29.84 51 2 97 via 19 “
80-radii = 31.41 59 2 6 via 20 “
84-radii = 32.98 67 2 23 via 21 “
88-radii = 34.55 75 1 86 via 22 “
92-radii = 36.12 83 1 49 via 23 “
96-radii = 37.69 91 1 12 via 24 “
100-radii = 39.26 99 0 75 via 25 “
104-radii = 40.84 07 0 38 via 26 “
108-radii = 42.41 15 001 via 27 “

112-radii = 43.98 22 9 64 via 28 “

116-radii = 45.55 30 9 27 via 29 “
120-radii = 47.12 38 8 9 via 30 “
124-radii = 48.69 46 8 53 via 31 “
128 radii = 50.26 54 8 16 via 32 “
132 radii = 51.83 62 7 79 via 33 “
136 radii = 53.40 70 7 42 via 34 “
140 radii = 54.97 78 7 05 via 35 “
144 radii = 56.54 86 6 68 via 36 “

148 radii = 58.11 94 6 31 via 37 “

152 radii = 59.69 02 5 94 via 38 “
156 radii = 61.26 10 5 57 via 39 “
160 radii = 62.83 18 5 2 via 40 “
164 radii = 64.40 26 4 83 via 41 “


168 radii = 65.97 34 4 46 via 42 “
..this is closet we come to 66.4 { Pi-Time }...


172 radii = 67.54 42 4 09 via 43 “

176 radii = 69.11 50 3 72 via 44 "
---------------------------------------

.......radii = 103.67 25 5 58 via 66 "

.......radii = 104.30 08 7 43 via 66.4

Dare To Be Naive
 

For me the only ones of Option #2, that have potentially, and seemingly significant relevance, are those number that are relatively close to rounding higher to the next whole rational number and there are four of those specific numbers.

And they each are related to #7 via multiples/divisors of seven.

28-radii = 10.99 55 7 41 via 7 -- great circles around tube, not whole torus { geo-numerical }
...close to 11....

56-radii = 21.99 11 4 82 via 14 ""-- i.e. 2 * 7 = 14.
....close to 22....

112-radii = 43.98 22 9 64 via 28 "-- i.e. 4 * 7 = 28
...close to 44...

140 radii = 54.97 78 7 05 via 35 " --i.e. 5 * 7 = 35
...close to 55....

So this is interesting to me even tho not sure this 2nd approach is of any significance to follow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(--) = Pi i.e. ratio of diameter to circle

-(--)- = Pi halved = 4 radii in my geo-numerical torusb i.e. diameter that is twice as long
..ergo Pi / 2 { halved } = 1.57 07 9 63 26 79 48 9 66 192313216916398.....

4-radii =1.57 07 9 63 as two Pi-based invaginations of one geodesic great circle around tube not whole torus

8-radii = 3.14 15 9 26 via two geodesic arcs define approximate one great circle "" ""

7, 14, 28, 35, 42 Circle/Cycle/Loops
 

..."The magic numbers for atoms are 2, 10, 18, 36, 54, and 86, corresponding to the total number of electrons in filled electron shells.

...The magic numbers for nuclei are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126. relatively close to rounding higher to the next whole rational number and there are four of those."..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.....rounding to higher rational number they each are related to #7 via multiples/divisors of seven.

28-radii = 10.99 55 7 41 via 7 "" ""
...close to 11....

56-radii = 21.99 11 4 82 via 14 great circles around tube, not whole torus { geo-numerical } i.e. 2 * 7 = 14.
....close to 22....

112-radii = 43.98 22 9 64 via 28 " i.e. 4 * 7 = 28
...close to 44...

140 radii = 54.97 78 7 05 via 35 " --i.e. 5 * 7 = 35
...close to 55 { 11th fibonacci number ...

168 radii = 65.97 34 4 46 via 42 " --i.e. 6 * 7 = 42
..closet to 66.4 { Pi-Time }...