Spiritual Forums

Spiritual Forums (http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/index.php)
-   Non Duality (http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=165)
-   -   Are WORDS basically dualistic? (http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=119843)

swampgrl 10-01-2018 02:02 AM

Are WORDS basically dualistic?
 
To me, describing nonduality with words is like unintentionally cloaking it with duality on some level (if not all levels).

Is discussion regarding nonduality akin to discussion on the complexities of a wardrobe?

Speaking of cloaks, one wears a cloak, one is not a cloak. Or as Philippe said in the movie The Man in the Iron Mask, "I wear the mask, it does not wear me."

So as a writer I recognize the irony of posting this but for some reason I find value in it.

It goes without saying that I welcome all other takes on this.

Btw, that is a nice shirt you're wearing!

Side Bar: It is as if words convey that nonduality is nonexistent/ unreal and yet it is all that exists.

Iamit 10-01-2018 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampgrl
To me, describing nonduality with words is like unintentionally cloaking it with duality on some level (if not all levels).

Is discussion regarding nonduality akin to discussion on the complexities of a wardrobe?

Speaking of cloaks, one wears a cloak, one is not a cloak. Or as Philippe said in the movie The Man in the Iron Mask, "I wear the mask, it does not wear me."

So as a writer I recognize the irony of posting this but for some reason I find value in it.

It goes without saying that I welcome all other takes on this.

Btw, that is a nice shirt you're wearing!

Side Bar: It is as if words convey that nonduality is nonexistent/ unreal and yet it is all that exists.


It seems that we use words to express thoughts and feelings. With good will it goes back and forth in the attempt to understand each other.

It happens here in duality but that is not a reason to regard the attempt as invalid......is it?

blossomingtree 10-01-2018 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampgrl
To me, describing nonduality with words is like unintentionally cloaking it with duality on some level (if not all levels).


Of course it is ironic, but as this is a forum, words are mostly what we have to use in this medium :smile:

swampgrl 10-01-2018 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iamit
It seems that we use words to express thoughts and feelings. With good will it goes back and forth in the attempt to understand each other.

It happens here in duality but that is not a reason to regard the attempt as invalid......is it?


As a writer on the subject I have to say no, it is not invalid. But is there a position where it is?

Quote:

Originally Posted by blossomingtree
Of course it is ironic, but as this is a forum, words are mostly what we have to use in this medium :smile:


I am reminded of that many times, blossomingtree, as I put mind to thought, pen to paper.

If nonduality were two, its language would be heart-to-heart and beyond all logic.

:love9:

blossomingtree 10-01-2018 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampgrl
I am reminded of that many times, blossomingtree, as I put mind to thought, pen to paper.

If nonduality were two, its language would be heart-to-heart and beyond all logic.

:love9:


Indeed, swampgrl. In a little stroke of synchronicity, this exact theme crossed my mind today as well - the irony of words in the non-duality forum, so thanks for posting.

Iamit 10-01-2018 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampgrl
As a writer on the subject I have to say no, it is not invalid. But is there a position where it is?


If the intention is simply to invalidate the other point of view then the attempt to understand each other is not the objective so in that sense can be said to be invalid.

swampgrl 12-01-2018 02:42 AM

No matter how elegant the words, duality can only hint at ________.

It cannot say or be.

swampgrl 12-01-2018 05:07 AM

All named things (i.e. ‘nonduality’) take on the appearance of things which is the realm of duality.
Just pointing out the trickery of mind/ words. Obviously ‘nonduality’ is a placeholder.

naturesflow 12-01-2018 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swampgrl
To me, describing nonduality with words is like unintentionally cloaking it with duality on some level (if not all levels).

Is discussion regarding nonduality akin to discussion on the complexities of a wardrobe?

Speaking of cloaks, one wears a cloak, one is not a cloak. Or as Philippe said in the movie The Man in the Iron Mask, "I wear the mask, it does not wear me."

So as a writer I recognize the irony of posting this but for some reason I find value in it.

It goes without saying that I welcome all other takes on this.

Btw, that is a nice shirt you're wearing!

Side Bar: It is as if words convey that nonduality is nonexistent/ unreal and yet it is all that exists.


If the mask has been removed I wonder how you would see all this?

swampgrl 13-01-2018 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naturesflow
If the mask has been removed I wonder how you would see all this?


Good question.

Perhaps see it as it really isn't.

If nonduality had a humor,........ what mask?


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums