Quote:
Ofcourse life here came from somewhere else, just how life on other planets would be from somewhere else. The elements here have mixed and stirred for who knows how long. These elements provide the blueprints for how life is to survive "if at all". The facts of how we differ from animals, and animals to reptiles, it doesnt discount our cominalities. At the base of our life systems we all have the same functions. Blood flow, oxygen flow, eating, and drinking. The height in which that life proceeds is beyond the point, that life exists. For it to exist it has gained against the elements, creating the life and leaves it a platform to do so again creating growth. Starting the cycle around existence/will. As a side note, those 4 things cycling around a point (living being) would be the spiral pattern again. Mostly we just focus on eating/drinking though. They suspect 75% of all matter in existance is hydrogen, second is helium. 46% of earths mass is oxygen. |
Quote:
Generally, the trouble with origin-of-life probability arguments is that you can reach wildly differing conclusions based on small changes in your assumptions. Quote:
|
Human dna - is just an elaborate computer code with consciousness.
Consciousness is the flowering of matter and evolution. If an asteroid did not hit earth millions of years ago. . . The dominant specie today will be reptilian humanoid and not monkey looking humans. |
Quote:
Well if you have reached this point then it may be a good time to examine the channelled Kryon material about this subject. The last book from Kryon about DNA may be the best place to start. https://www.kryon.com/k_66.html Some written information about these concepts are on the web site. http://www.kryon.com/k_25.html There is also an audio MP3 only page which includes those messages not transcribed to visual presentations. https://www.kryon.com/k_freeaudio.html I have worked as a programmer for a good part of my life. My focus at this time involves using the assembly language FASM. It is foundational to languages like C#. So is this Kryon information. I hope you find this material worthwhile. John |
I am thinking that those links about Kryon were not specific enough for this thread. So I picked out one of the many messages on this subject.
http://www.kryon.com/k_channel10_melbourne_1.html I hope this particular insight will be informative. John |
QuanKev...
I did not read the entire thread, but just wanted to support you. I too am a programmer, and the more I read and learn, the similarities to Object Oriented Programming are astounding. If you haven't already, I think you would enjoy books written by channeled entity Seth. These were done in the 60's I believe, but it will knock you out with the deep details of the inner workings of things. Just his constant use of the word "Framework" alone parallels programming knowledge of today, and they did not have that when these books were written. Also, everyone is not on the same spiritual level. No matter how clear something is to you, you can draw diagrams, flowharts, etc of it, someone who is not spiritually on a level to receive such knowledge will not get it, no matter how hard you try. Knowing this can save lots of futile debates/fights/frustrations. And it does not matter any way if they get it, all will evolve in this or another lifetime. Have fun on this path. |
DNA and genetics is a difficult one, our DNA isn't set in stone when we are born, some can vary and be 'turned on and off' if you will due to childhood situations and experiences. In coding I suppose this would be almost like an IF statement.
IF such and such happens, turn on this gene, ELSE keep turned off etc. Its very interesting research really. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(For what it's worth, I also have some programming experience. As an undergraduate, and currently continuing as a graduate student, I spend time coding condensed matter physics models which include some crazy blend of FORTRAN (yes, people still use it, haha), python, perl and Linux shell scripts.) |
Quote:
About simple If-Else: kinda but not really. In object oriented programming there are objects that have properties, events and methods. It kinda takes care of itself. True about the not set in stone. That would suck. |
Quote:
and with some few other affirmations i managed to read. i must say that for our scientists, the junk DNA seems this way because us, humans, didnt find a use for it yet. However, if a stuy were to be conducted on those with special abilities, like on those who can divinate correctly, or on those who excel in something, maybe their DNA is better used, as in, they may have less junk DNA. but one cant know this, and it may never be found out, because we need say, at least 100 people to conduct a study and all of them should also have the same ability..or something - for the most accurate result, and not say its a coincidence. in addition, i believe that the way life and nature is today, is a result of a trial and error experiment as well. survival of the fittest is also a trial and error kind of thing. and to prove you that this theory fits right in with yours, think a bit about how even programmers dont always get the software they design to work from first try. or any other scientist.. ;) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums